01 October 2010Information provider Content Merchant LimitedService provider Tanla Solutions UK LtdInformation provider location Wales and GlasgowService provider location LondonService type Competition - Subscription2. The Information Provider stated that there had only been a limited amount of consumers that may have been affected by the incorrect text messages sent by the Information Provider. It stated that the vast majority of text messages had been fully correct and compliant, and that the incorrect text messages had been sent as a result of a limit on the number of characters technically available in the text message, which had resulted in the last third of the text message being cut off. It stated that this missing third of the text had contained some standard, required information, such as the identity of the Service Provider, a helpline and the opt-out command. The Information Provider stated that it fully accepted responsibility for this error.Having taken into account the aggravating factors and the mitigating factors, the Tribunal concluded that the seriousness of the case should be regarded overall as serious.Having regard to all the circumstances of the case, including the revenue of the service, the Tribunal decided to impose the following sanctions:A Formal Reprimand;A fine of £10,000; 02 September 2010Information provider Content Merchant LtdService provider Wireless Information Network LtdInformation provider location GlasgowService provider location High WycombeService type Subscription download serviceThe Executive was later notified of a technical error which allegedly occurred on 28 September 2009. The Information Provider suggested that a group of mobile phone numbers from within the marketing data base had been registered by the company as subscribed to the service as opposed to sent marketing material as had been originally intended.Having taken into account the aggravating factors and the mitigating factors, the Tribunal concluded that the seriousness of the case should be regarded overall as serious.Having regard to all the circumstances of the case, including the revenue of the service, the Tribunal decided to impose the following sanctions:A Formal Reprimand.A fine of £30,000.
01 October 2010Information provider Content Merchant LimitedService provider Tanla Solutions UK LtdInformation provider location Wales and GlasgowService provider location LondonService type Competition - Subscription2. The Information Provider stated that there had only been a limited amount of consumers that may have been affected by the incorrect text messages sent by the Information Provider. It stated that the vast majority of text messages had been fully correct and compliant, and that the incorrect text messages had been sent as a result of a limit on the number of characters technically available in the text message, which had resulted in the last third of the text message being cut off. It stated that this missing third of the text had contained some standard, required information, such as the identity of the Service Provider, a helpline and the opt-out command. The Information Provider stated that it fully accepted responsibility for this error.Having taken into account the aggravating factors and the mitigating factors, the Tribunal concluded that the seriousness of the case should be regarded overall as serious.Having regard to all the circumstances of the case, including the revenue of the service, the Tribunal decided to impose the following sanctions:A Formal Reprimand;A fine of £10,000;
02 September 2010Information provider Content Merchant LtdService provider Wireless Information Network LtdInformation provider location GlasgowService provider location High WycombeService type Subscription download serviceThe Executive was later notified of a technical error which allegedly occurred on 28 September 2009. The Information Provider suggested that a group of mobile phone numbers from within the marketing data base had been registered by the company as subscribed to the service as opposed to sent marketing material as had been originally intended.Having taken into account the aggravating factors and the mitigating factors, the Tribunal concluded that the seriousness of the case should be regarded overall as serious.Having regard to all the circumstances of the case, including the revenue of the service, the Tribunal decided to impose the following sanctions:A Formal Reprimand.A fine of £30,000.
Company Name:CONTENT MERCHANT LIMITED Company No: 06898120 Registered Office:Incorporated: 07/05/2009FIELDS HOUSE12/13 OLD FIELD ROADBOCAM PARKPENCOEDWALESCF35 5LJCompany Type: Private Limited CompanyCompany Status: ActiveAPPOINTMENT TERMINATED, SECRETARY RICHARD CABLE 28/05/2010 Company Name:FIELDS GROUP LIMITED Company No: 05728410 Registered Office:Incorporated: 02/03/2006 12/13 OLD FIELD ROADBOCAM PARKPENCOEDBRIDGENDCF35 5LJCompany Type: Private Limited CompanyCompany Status: ActiveAPPOINTMENT TERMINATED, DIRECTOR RICHARD CABLE 26/01/2010
Company Name:CONTENT MERCHANT LIMITED Company No: 06898120 Registered Office:Incorporated: 07/05/2009FIELDS HOUSE12/13 OLD FIELD ROADBOCAM PARKPENCOEDWALESCF35 5LJCompany Type: Private Limited CompanyCompany Status: ActiveAPPOINTMENT TERMINATED, SECRETARY RICHARD CABLE 28/05/2010
Company Name:FIELDS GROUP LIMITED Company No: 05728410 Registered Office:Incorporated: 02/03/2006 12/13 OLD FIELD ROADBOCAM PARKPENCOEDBRIDGENDCF35 5LJCompany Type: Private Limited CompanyCompany Status: ActiveAPPOINTMENT TERMINATED, DIRECTOR RICHARD CABLE 26/01/2010